|
|
HOME
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- WAR ROOM -
THE GOSPEL
- BIBLE
STUDY - MORAL
ISSUES - KING
JAMES BIBLE - CULTS |
|
It is clearly obvious that sodomy will soon be institutionalized world wide. Only seventy years ago sodomites were killed or imprisoned in most nations of the world. Today, any nation which wants a voice in the United Nations must approve of sodomy in its law codes. Now, Massachusetts is hell bent for election of sodomites as married people. It is clearly obvious that sodomy will soon be institutionalized world wide. Only seventy years ago sodomites were killed or imprisoned in most nations of the world. Today, any nation which wants a voice in the United Nations must approve of sodomy in its law codes. Now, Massachusetts is hell bent for election of sodomites as married people. |
| VOCABULARY LESSON: "The Nov. 18 ruling by the Massachusetts Supreme Court, effectively striking down the state's ban on same-sex marriage, enshrines everything America stands for: Equality, personal freedom, separation of church and state and "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," to name a few. Hardly an official edict declaring "Gay is great," it affirms personal freedom, nothing more." "Unsurprisingly,
Blessed
Quietness Editor: In
the spirit of the above violation of freedom of speech by the jerk Mississippi
newspaper, we at Blessed Quietness Journal go on record stating that we
are indeed Tough beans if that offends someone! We're
Straight, Sodomites
kill each other... The Supreme Court promotes the death of sodomites Sodomites
are New York and Californication are going to destroy the US economy financing sodomite AIDS victims. The cost of AIDS is hidden in Social Security, SSI, Medicare, VA, and other budgets for general health. This is done to deceive the public into thinking AIDS costs are not terribly high. For every $10 spent per cancer death on cancer research, $110 is spent per AIDS death on AIDS research NIH
allocates $2,100 per year for each HIV/AIDS patient-- It costs $50,000 per AIDS victim per year for drugs alone. That is $50,000,000,000. If the average AIDS patient would make $30,000 in salary per year, the GNP loses a minimum of $30,000,000,000 per year. If
the 1,000,000 estimate of people with AIDS in the USA is multiplied by 4, as three
highly placed US health officials instructed me on the phone, the net loss to
the US economy is minimum: Now, we can only imagine what the loss is to the tax base by those who stop working and wait to die. 160,000 new cases a year (real numbers)... My estimate in 1990 of the net loss to the US economy in 2004was around $1,500,000,000,000 In
1990 I also predicted that the US would have to recruit Mexicans to work for us.
---------- It is urgent that Bible believing churches come up with an alternative to state sanctioned marriage. Churches need a contract that is filed in a second place, possibly only with the county clerk locally. The Justice of the Peace, or whoever is designated to register marriages, needs to be left behind. If the marriage is not recognized by Caesar, then a class action law suit needs to be set in motion to force Caesar to accept Christian marriage as a separate entity. Here is a filthy bag of trash in Canada. Moses would have stoned this natural brute beast. In fact, that sounds like a real nice way that Canadians could serve their nation well. San Francisco is on its way to becoming a city state of flaming lust addicts. California law is being abrogated, and if the state does not have the will to act, SF will be bigger than all the rest of California as a world entity. Good bye Amerika. You have let the male organ violate the law of the land, and the law of God. God will bring fire down soon-- Perhaps the fire of economic collapse, or the fire of pandemic.
|
You who have registered your churches as "Non Profit Corporations" are in for some hard times. Caesar is your true and lawful boss, and YOU invited him to sit on your church board. You will soon be told that designating people as "married" is politically incorrect. Marriage will soon be added to those designations which are racist and socially discriminatory. You will NOT be able to issue marriage certificates. Also, sodomite couples will soon be invading your "young married class" to make an issue of their sodomite rights. You will lose your tax exemption if you try to show them the door. If you decide to give up your nonprofit status, your dissolution clause will kick in, and you will lose everything but the shirt on your back. Praise God, we will then find out why some of your alleged "servants of Christ" are in the life.
The collusion between the Lord's Church and Caesar over the past seventy years is about to pay off in rotten fruit.
True Bible believers must start to innovate NOW to prepare for the deadly games of the sodomite devils. The churches of anything over 150 people will be forced to their knees by the sodomite masses if they want to keep their glorious real estate and crystal palace.
Local churches need to start keeping records of all matters in their members' lives. This is what was done 150 years ago in Great Britain. Birth, salvation, baptism, marriage, and death records must be kept so that people have a God honoring record of their life events. This is because many of these records will no longer be politically correct for Caesar to keep. I leave out church membership because that is not a biblical concept.
Other than the above, record keeping must be kept at a bare minimum as to other dealings. Minutes of meetings are deadly in a world turning rapidly in rage against the Lord's Church. Business meetings must be very private and not recorded officially. Church constitutions and by-laws must be burned. The King James Bible must be the ONLY document of the local church. Before it is an issue, wise pastors will unregister their churches. This is easily done if you seriously want to do it. Just have your officers Quit Claim the property from themselves as officers of the nonprofit corporation to the new entity, with a new name, and have a notary present to sign the Quit Claim. File a copy with the country clerk ONLY, and go on doing business as a church for a change. DO NOT issue tax receipts, even though it is provided for in the IRS tax code. Do NOTHING which is even remotely associated with Caesar. The First Amendment of the US Constitution provides for a church to operate 100% free of Caesar's supervision. Of course, you big boys in the order of the peck of your Baptist and Pentecostal organizations will tell you this is dangerous. LIE!
Some of you fools cannot stand to trust your friends in Christ and deal verbally. You want to "get it in writing," so you will find your fat church files will one day land you in prison.
As to sodomy, it is time to hold private teaching sessions in which the Word of God is opened, and young people are turned in hate against the sin of sodomy. Fathers must tell their sons, at about age 14, what sodomites do to each other. They put their penises in one another's mouths and anuses. They defecate in one another's mouths. They wee on one another. And, they cannot make babies, so they recruit young boys to see if they can turn them into sodomites. A young man must be encouraged to be vicious against all advances of sodomites toward him or his other young friends. Young men need to learn fighting techniques they can use when they are accosted by sodomites. Young ladies, at about age 16, need to be told, by their mothers, what lesbians do with one another.
I realize this is a terrible responsibility to open such filth to young people, but the alternatives are far more treacherous. Many a parent of a sodomite or lesbian now regrets that they did not aggressively turn their child against this incipient sin many years ago. Pastors will answer to God if they do not take positive loving steps to prejudice their congregations against the sin of sodomy, as well as all sin.
Lot was a real idiot for not leaving Sodom. I suspect that Mrs. Lot was the problem. She looked back at Sodom and died for it. She undoubtedly was the one who demanded that Lot stay in Sodom. It is the mothers in the Lord's Church who are the biggest pain in the neck in regard to sodomy. Mothers will get this silly idea that it is not necessary to tell a boy or girl enough to make them revolted at sin and want to throw up. Women in the local church will press the pastor to be more loving and tactful. These women need to be reigned in by their wimpy husbands and their pastors. Lot, I suspect, would have left Sodom, but his wife and daughters, like modern day "Queen Bees," were justifying the sins of Sodom. Why else would we read:
2
Peter 2:6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them
with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;
7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:
8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed
his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)
Lot was vexed with sodomy, but the old lady thought sodomites were cute. She even let her daughters marry sodomites. They were married, as we learn in Genesis 19, but they were virgins, as we learned from Lot in that chapter. Their husbands were sodomites. Lot's wife and daughters liked the benefits of prosperity and power that Sodom gave them. Thus it is with weak minded women today in the Lord's Church. Their husbands hate sodomy, but these fool hags keep quieting the old man down because of some advantage they get from being tolerant of sodomy. Or, some sodomite, empowered by the devil in him, is very helpful and gentle with these women so they think the sodomites are "so nice." These women need to be told forcefully what sodomites do with one another. There are a lot of diddle head men, I fear, who do not know the facts of demonic life either.
Listen up-- Did Jesus die for sodomites? Absolutely, but no one EVER got saved who did not deal directly with their sin and repent of it. If a sodomite is going to get saved, it will be when a saint, who hates the sin of sodomy, gives the Gospel to that sodomite. I have lead one sodomite to Christ, and I have lead one backslidden sodomite to seek victory again. It can be done, but NOT by pampering the sodomite. The Holy Ghost is not a wimp-- ARE YOU?
John
16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away:
for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I
will send him unto you.
8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of
sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
There is a great conscience in the whole world these days which is the product of Liberal egg heads who meddle eagerly in things which count very little. Because DDT has been cursed, 80 million people in Africa have died of malaria in recent years. DDT might indeed have caused some minor health issues, but if you had ever seen someone go through the day by day stages of malaria, only to fight it off and be left mentally impaired from the high fever, then you would realize what treachery the world health fools have wrecked on Africa and all other tropical nations. I have had severe malaria in Ethiopia, and a friend took me to the hospital just in time. When the government mosquito control men came by our home and wanted to spray it, we moved out and let them spray everything in sight. Am I still sane? I am sane enough to make you sodomite lovers mad as hops with this editorial. And, I may very well have residual DDT in me. So what? It ain't affec--affec--affec--affected me yet :-)
Asbestos has been 100% outlawed in the USA. There are safe uses of asbestos, but never mind, paranoia prevails. The same idiots who ban asbestos make no effort to ban tobacco, a true killer. Many more such examples could be given.
These same Liberal egg heads who are so very cautious and vicious about DDT and asbestos are eager, no, they are mad with delight, that men who ram their members up one another posteriors be declared married people. They make NO effort to associate AIDS with sodomy, which accounts for about 95% of the spread of the disease. These twinks exult in the sheer joy of helping a young lady kill her unborn baby. It is about time that Bible believing pastors declare war on Liberals and abomination mongers.
Preacher, who will bell the cat if you will not do it?
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, DRY DRUNKS, AND "RIGHTS"
President George Bush says marriage needs to be "clarified" officially. Why? The Word of God has "clarified" marriage since Adam and Eve were created. God himself "clarified" marriage. Jesus restated what Adam stated, and Paul taught the delights of a man and woman marrying and being faithful to one another.
So, why does a dry drunk from Texas need "clarification?" I thought this was a born again man. I thought his main role model was Jesus Christ. Why do I see photos, several times, on the web of him flashing the Satanic salute of Baphomet? I smell a rat in the dry drunk's bag of tricks.
There is a call now for a Constitutional amendment on marriage. If the courts were not to subvert such an amendment, the words "male and female" would have to be used. God used them in Genesis 2 and 3. Why does this alleged "Christian Nation" need to put them in its official documents. Are there no preachers who will preach it. Do they need Dr. James Dumbson to define morality for them? The ACLU has used the First Amendment to establish sodomy as accepted lifestyle. They would use anything on marriage to promote sodomy even further.
My friend Joe said he was against such an Constitutional amendment. He said it would, de facto, be a BAN on sodomite marriage. His question was, "Once they can ban something in the Constitution, what else would they want to ban?" Perhaps a Constitutional Amendment would be established which defined a Federally approved teacher - student relationship. Number one would be that the parent is not qualified to teacher their child.
How about a Constitutional Amendment defining the nature of an acceptable church. How about an acceptable pastor? The IRS would easily convince Americans that this is needed to make sure the nonprofit status of churches is protected and sound. Do you want the US Constitution to define what you do on Sunday and what your pastor is made of-- what he can preach on?
When the electorate, or the representatives of the electorate, make laws, amendments, or codes defining a moral matter like marriage, they are delving into an area which is about 90% religious. The justice of the peace sees two people, identifies them, and marries them. The church makes a major event of marriage. The pastor counsels them for months, the whole congregation participates, and if the married couple betrays their vows, the church will discipline them for it. Every effort is made to sustain the marriage and the children produced in that marriage. The subject is preached on frequently, and marriage is a major topic in the reading of the Word of God. Even the coming reward of the Lord's Church is spoken of as the Marriage Feast of the Lamb, and the Church as the Bride of Christ.
Here is a modern definition of "Normal Religion." It is not far at all from the policy of the USA as defined by the IRS and the courts of nonprofit corporate churches"
1. Religion has a process of origination, development and extinction. And it will exist in the socialist society for a long period of time. Therefore, we may neither extinguish nor develop religion by administrative means.
2. Freedom of religious belief is protected by the Constitution. People enjoy freedom to believe in religion, and freedom not to believe in religion.
3. We shall publicize atheism. However, we cannot equate the difference between theism and atheism to the political confrontation. We need to adhere to the principle of cooperation in terms of politics, and mutual respect in terms of faith.
4. The government shall administer religious affairs according to law, protect normal religious activities and religious people's legal rights, and deter criminal activities conducted in the name of religion.
5. Contradictions with respect to religion in our country are mainly the ones from among the people. However, under certain circumstances confrontations might occur. Therefore, we need to strictly differentiate and carefully handle contradictions of two different types of essence.
6. The principle of self-running the church shall be adhered to. Foreign goodwill religious exchanges shall be conducted on the basis of equality. Infiltrations by hostile overseas forces in the name of religion shall be boycotted. No overseas religious group or individual shall be allowed to interfere in our country's religious affairs.
7. Patriotic religious groups serve as the bridge linking the Party, the government and religious people. We shall give them support in their self-development, self-conducted activities, and in fulfilling their roles.
8. Patriotic religious personnel are an important force in solidifying religious believers, and safeguarding the social stability. Religious groups shall train patriotic religious personnel purposely and systematically.
9. We shall positively channel religion to adapt to the socialist society. Religious believers shall combine their faith with patriotism, and conduct their activities within the framework of law and government policy.
10. All religious groups and believers shall safeguard the dignity of law, the interests of people, the national solidarity and reunification.
The nation? China-- modern democratic capitalistic China.
Here is what happens when the Federal Government defines politically correct speech:
LIMBAUGH WARNS OF DANGER TO FREE SPEECH
THU FEB 26 2004 12:28:21 ET
THE NATION'S TOP RADIO HOST RUSH LIMBAUGH WARNED OF GROWING GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION IN BROADCASTING CONTENT.
LIMBAUGH MADE THE COMMENTS AFTER HIS PARENT COMPANY CLEAR CHANNEL DROPPED VIACOM'S HOWARD STERN FROM ITS STATIONS.
'SMUT ON TV GETS PRAISED. SMUT ON TV WINS EMMYS. ON RADIO, THERE SEEMS TO BE DIFFERENT STANDARDS,' LIMBAUGH EXPLAINED.
'I'VE NEVER HEARD HOWARD STERN. BUT WHEN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GETS INVOLVED IN THIS, I GET A LITTLE FRIGHTENED.
'IF WE ARE GOING TO SIT BY AND LET THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GET INVOLVED IN THIS, IF THE GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO 'CENSOR' WHAT THEY THINK IS RIGHT AND WRONG... WHAT HAPPENS IF A WHOLE BUNCH OF JOHN KERRYS, OR TERRY MCAULIFFES START RUNNING THIS COUNTRY. AND DECIDE CONSERVATIVE VIEWS ARE LEADING TO VIOLENCE?
'I AM IN THE FREE SPEECH BUSINESS. ITS ONE THING FOR A COMPANY TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE GOING TO BE PARTY TO IT. ITS ANOTHER THING FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO DO IT.'
Now, what does this all have to do with stopping sodomite marriage?
Simply this-- If the Lord's Church were local churches, unencumbered by this insane nonprofit corporation bondage, and preaching the truth with zeal, yea, wrath, yea, rage.... the sodomite issue would be dealt with as well as it possibly can be in the New Testament model. The problem is, some of you jerkwater preachers want the Feds to keep the nation, the church house, the Christian School, your town, and your home, safe and clean. Well, that did not work with Prohibition, and it will not work with sodomite marriage. No document other than the preached King James Bible will salt and preserve a society.
1
Corinthians 1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness;
but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.
19 For it is written,
I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding
of the prudent.
20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer
of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?
21 For
after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God
by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
Since when is the wisdom of the US Constitution the salvation of society, let alone the local church and souls in general. Frankly, I believe you preachers want the Feds to stop sodomite marriage so you can let the scum go to hell. If they run around playing like they are married, they will come to your church, right? Then you will have to make a decision and act on what you claim to believe. Here it is in real life.
I would personally rather sit down with two queers that think they are married and give them the Gospel, yea, breath out damnation if need be, than to deal with the sodomites who are defined by Caesar. If the sodomites are willing to listen, even debate, there is this tiny shred of hope for them. If Caesar defines them, they own my acre, as they see it. My Jesus is a queer to them.
So, we do NOT need a Constitutional Amendment on marriage.
Furthermore; having seen how President Bush and John Ashcroft have used 9/11 to take away our liberty and privacy in the USA, I do NOT want this dry drunk defining ANY of my rights. In fact, and I bet I catch it for this, I like Liberals like Kennedy, Clinton, and Kerry. These flakes do far less harm than conservatives, and here is why-- Conservatives go on guard like pitbulls when a Liberal enters the White House. It was a "God and country" Conservative name Ronald Reagan who ran the USA deeper in debt than any other President. It was a Conservative named George H Bush who signed the Hate Crimes Act in to law which supports the UN Genocide Treaty signed by, uh huh, Ronald Reagan. And, what shall we say about the filthy mouthed liar and egomaniac named Richard Nixon. Finally, was Adolph Hitler a Liberal or a Conservative? Was Franco a Liberal or a Conservative?
I do not want ANY of them adding one improvement to the documents of the USA. Before you know it, a Constitutional Convention will be called, and America will then be reinvented by the Skull and Bones Club and Alan Greenspan.
If the queers want to marry, let them. Sodom is here to stay. Give them maternity leave too. Let's see them make a baby. Sodomites are not faithful to one another at all, and marriage will just become a big joke to them. Even the wicked will laugh. The fact that queers are married in no way compromises my marriage. My marriage is between God, my wife, and me. There are all sorts of precious things God gave me, and his Church, which the world tries to copy. Both they, and we, know the difference. I also like the idea of queers being in church every Sunday morning-- in the churches which accept them. That helps define things somehow.
Meanwhile, how about you preachers getting your local church unregistered with Caesar? How about preaching boldly on these issues? How about guarding the door and making the church gatherings private instead of lusting for numbers? How about going from house to house, eating and breaking bread together, and keeping the Apostles' doctrine?
SAN FRANCISCO STORY
A scene at City Hall in San Francisco
"Next."
"Good morning. We want to apply for a marriage license."
"Names?"
"Tim and Jim Jones."
"Jones? Are you related? I see a resemblance."
"Yes, we're brothers."
"Brothers? You can't get married."
"Why not? Aren't you giving marriage licenses to same gender couples?"
"Yes, thousands. But we haven't had any siblings. That's incest!"
"Incest?" No, we are not gay."
"Not gay? Then why do you want to get married?"
"For the financial benefits, of course. And we do love each other. Besides, we don't have any other prospects."
"But we're issuing marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples who've been denied equal protection under the law. If you are not gay, you can get married to a woman."
"Wait a minute. A gay man has the same right to marry a woman as I have. But just because I'm straight doesn't mean I want to marry a woman. I want to marry Jim."
"And I want to marry Tim, Are you going to discriminate against us just because we are not gay?"
"All right, all right. I'll give you your license. Next."
"Hi. We are here to get married."
"Names?"
"John Smith, Jane James, Robert Green, and June Johnson."
"Who wants to marry whom?"
"We all want to marry each other."
"But there are four of you!"
"That's right. You see, we're all bisexual. I love Jane and Robert, Jane loves me and June, June loves Robert and Jane, and Robert loves June and me. All of us getting married together is the only way that we can express our sexual preferences in a marital relationship."
"But we've only been granting licenses to gay and lesbian couples."
"So you're discriminating against bisexuals!"
"No, it's just that, well, the traditional idea of marriage is that it's just for couples."
"Since when are you standing on tradition?"
"Well, I mean, you have to draw the line somewhere."
"Who says? There's no logical reason to limit marriage to couples. The more the better. Besides, we demand our rights! The mayor says the constitution guarantees equal protection under the law. Give us a marriage license!"
"All right, all right. Next."
"Hello, I'd like a marriage license."
"In what names?"
"David Deets."
"And the other man?"
"That's all. I want to marry myself."
"Marry yourself? What do you mean?"
"Well, my psychiatrist says I have a dual personality, so I want to marry the two together. Maybe I can file a joint income-tax return."
"That does it! I quit!! You people are making a mockery of marriage!!"
BACK TO WAR ROOM-- GENERAL WICKEDNESS
RETURN TO ENTRY PAGE OF JOURNAL