Searching for the Truth in the King James Bible;
Finding it, and passing it on to you.

EDITOR:
Steve Van Nattan

HOME PAGE

HOME - TABLE OF CONTENTS - WAR ROOM - THE GOSPEL - BIBLE STUDY - MORAL ISSUES - KING JAMES BIBLE - CULTS
HUMOR - PROPHECY - WORLD AFFAIRS - QUIET PLACE - STEVE'S YARNS - STEVE'S BIO - HEALTH - LADIES' PAGE - HEROES

AMERICAN LIFE LEAGUE ARTICLES
ON SODOMY

This article is here because I had to find it in a very obscure place on the Web, and I fear it is about to be lost.
Steve Van Nattan

What the Anti-Lifers Say

"Fairness. That's all we're asking for. Protection from unfair discrimination in jobs and housing. An end to anti-gay violence. Immigration reform. Defeat of bigoted laws denying human dignity and equal justice to lesbians and gay men."

- Human Rights Campaign Fund.²

Gays want no more than any other group of United States citizens; all we want is equal rights, freedom from unfair discrimination and hate crimes, and the right to live our lives as we please.

We do not have these rights now. Gays must remain rigidly closeted, because anyone who comes "out" is mercilessly hounded and attacked by self-righteous bigots and fanatics. We are denied decent housing. We are denied job and welfare benefits. We essentially occupy the same place in society that Blacks did 30 years ago.

The Real "Homosexual Agenda"

"I want to go to my job. I want to have a home. I want to save my money. And I want to go on vacation. What kind of hidden agenda are they talking about?"

- Homosexual activist Frank Brown.³

The True Danger Lies Deeper. Many anti-"gay rights" activists speak glibly of the "radical homosexual agenda" that they oppose for the good of the family and the nation. Most of the Christians who are actively fighting "gay rights" are motivated primarily by the rather lengthy list of homosexual demands, which includes the right to housing and jobs, the right to marry, the right to adopt and raise children, and the right to bear arms in the military.

It is true that many or perhaps even most homosexual activists would be satisfied with these and other gains in society. However, these demands are just a front for the true "radical homosexual agenda" as outlined by the most powerful and influential thinkers behind the "gay rights" movement.

The true "homosexual agenda" cannot be described by a mere list of demands; it is far too general and wide in scope for that. It can only be stated in generalities and in moral directions.

Instead of tearing at society's fabric, the true "homosexual agenda" cuts entirely through it, and it is time that Christians realized this fact. The true "homosexual agenda" is limitlessly more dangerous than any imaginable amount of relatively superficial social tinkering could ever be.

Queer Revolutionaries. Christians activists must recognize that the "gay rights" movement is fundamentally revolutionary in nature - or they will decisively lose the real "gay rights" battle.

It is not enough to defend the family against redefinition and dilution. It is not enough to oppose "domestic partnership" laws and pro-homosexual sex education programs in the public schools. And it is not enough to fight against "gays" in the military. The Christian activist must recognize the fundamental nature of the "queer revolution" and must attack it at its very roots.

The objective of the homosexual radicals is not equality but the total and (if necessary) violent overthrow of what they see as an "oppressive" social system. To homosexual radicals, anything that is normal is "oppressive," therefore everything that is normal must be destroyed.

Even "tolerance," which is a normal trait, must be obliterated, because tolerance implies that some people are putting up with activities that they find abnormal or distasteful. Since the model "queer" considers himself to be the purest and most unalloyed product of this "New Age," he and he alone represents the purest essence of humanity and the pinnacle of true Humanist perfection. Therefore, he will not condone tolerance - only close imitation and admiration will suffice.

A Christian who understands the basic tenets of Communism will immediately grasp the fundamentals of revolutionary homosexuality. The "gay rights" movement is a close cousin of the revolutionary Communists, who desire nothing more or less than the destruction of the "old" system and its replacement with a New Utopia.

The Queer Objective. "Queer theorists" have stated their ultimate objective in academic manifestos: "Queer politics is no longer content to carve out a buffer zone for a minoritized and protected subculture. Our goal is to challenge the pervasive and often invisible heteronormativity of modern societies ... Our task is to confront modern culture with its worst nightmare - a queer planet."¹

And another homosexual activist wrote in a Guide Magazine editorial that "Our work will only be finished when we can say that the whole world is gay."⁴

A third "queer theorist" wrote in Village Voice that "It isn't enough to become parallel to straights. We want to obliterate such dichotomies altogether."

As the Marxists dream of obliterating class distinctions, activist homosexuals wish to obliterate all sexual distinctions. In a "queer planet," everyone would be omnisexual and gender-unconscious, with complete license to perform any sex act anywhere at any time. Those who do not conform (i.e., those in a monogamous marriage) would become the new "faggots," the new outcasts, the new sexual perverts.

In other words, the homosexual strategists are not looking for equality with straights - they want straights to be identical to them. They do not want to be part of the current society - they want to remake society in their own image.

They want to eradicate racism, sexism, heterosexism, species-ism, age-ism, and every other "ism," thereby reconstructing society from the ground up, on the ruins of the old system - just as the Communists attempted to do.

"Gay rights" spokesmen say to the media that they are the inheritors of the civil rights tradition.

This is bunk.

Martin Luther King wanted Blacks to have the right to participate fully in our society as equals.

The homosexuals want to force society to conform to their morality. As such, they bear more of a similarity to the American slavers than they do to Abolitionists.

Man and Woman They Uncreated Them. In our "queer planet," not only would God be dead, but Nature as well. There would be no identification by gender because there would be only one gender: Queer. The words "male" and "female" would disappear from the vocabulary.

Descriptive terms as applied to human beings would vanish, since they imply a standard of "normativity." There would be no "unwed mothers," because this would imply that the norm is wed mothers. There would be no non-religious or atheistic people, because these terms imply comparison with the norm, which is religious people. And, of course, there would be no adultery, fornication, or perverted sex acts, because these are considered abnormal now.¹

The End of It All. Just as Communism failed, so also will the dream of the "queer theorists," and for precisely the same reasons.

The great danger posed by the "queer revolution" is that, in the process of failing, the homosexuals might very well damage society to the point where it simply cannot recover.

More Incrementalism

Hardly a "Gentle But Angry" People. Despite the growing flood of media propaganda that stresses the Politically Correct view, homosexuals are anything but a harmless and peaceful minority.

Homosexuals (and even some properly indoctrinated Christians) laugh with derision when the words "homosexual agenda" are mentioned. But this ridicule is a mere coverup for the reality. What the homosexuals would have us believe is that 25 million people (their vastly inflated number), bound together strongly by their illicit and perverted sexual practices, have no common interests or goals that they would like to achieve.

This assertion is absurd on its face and should be exposed for what it is: Pure propaganda.

The homosexual strategists know that they will never be able to achieve their ultimate goal of a "queer planet" without a long series of small steps whose purpose is to "soften up" and prepare society for the coup de grace.

The Intermediate Steps. Despite "gay" ridicule, the various intermediate points of the homosexual agenda in this country are very real. They have even been written down. The list of homosexual demands is very detailed, and the homosexuals pursue it relentlessly.

Believe it or not, the homosexuals, as documented in this chapter, aggressively demand;

• the closing of all churches that oppose them;
  
• the total destruction of the family through redefinition;
  
• exile and actual murder of those who oppose them in any way;
  
• the "conversion" by forced sodomy of all young men to homosexuality;
  
• the official condemnation of normal love between men and women, and
  
• the raising of private armies of thugs to enforce their agenda.

While keeping their eyes on the fact that the "gay rights" movement is revolutionary in nature, Christian activists should strive to deny the homosexuals victory in these intermediate goals. By successfully holding off "gay rights" gains, Christians will be doing a lot towards denying homosexuals their ultimate dream of a gender-free society.

Total Ruthlessness

"Today's politicized lesbians gather in caucuses, swap childhood molestation stories, and lock themselves in the bathroom with a turkey baster full of somebody's brother's semen to take a shot at New Age parthenogenesis."

- Lesbian Florence King.⁵

Homosexual activists are utterly ruthless in the pursuit of their perverted goals. They are restrained by no morality or any standard of decency, and care nothing of anyone else, especially those who do not share their worldview. They have even recommended mass murder as a means of achieving their objectives.

For example, before a blood screening test for the HIV virus was developed, militant homosexual activist Robert Schwab wrote that; "If research money is not forthcoming at a certain level by a certain date, all gay males should give blood. Whatever action is required to get national attention is valid. If that includes blood terrorism, so be it."⁶

Numerous other examples of homosexual terrorism and violence are described in detail in Chapter 118, "Homosexual Tactics."

Spelling It Out

"When the [gay rights] bill passes, there will be something else. There will always be something else."

- A homosexual activist on the eve of the New York City Council vote on a "gay rights" bill.⁷

The Total Agenda. Perhaps no single work has summarized the actual, unobscured objectives of the homosexuals as well as an essay that was first printed in the February 15, 1987 issue of the homosexual newspaper Gay Community News by militant homosexual Michael Swift, and reprinted in the February 15-21 1987 Congressional Record. It quite adequately sums up the entire homosexual agenda. Observe how much of this agenda has already been accomplished.

Keep in mind that this essay was not printed by an enemy of homosexuality; it was distributed by the homosexuals themselves. It is reprinted verbatim in Figure 117-1, with no additions or deletions. Although homosexual strategists loudly insist that this essay is a joke or a dream, their actions demonstrate differently.

Swift's short essay gives the lie to the already-strained myth of homosexual "tolerance." While the homosexuals whine for understanding and tolerance towards themselves, in just one short page they label all normal people "feeble," "vulgar," "vicious," "cowardly," "puny," "superficial," "sentimental," "cheap," "insipid," "juvenile," "weaklings," "liars," "hypocrites," "traitors," "stupid," "dumb," and "swine."

Rather strange language from such a tolerant, sympathetic, understanding group of open-minded freethinkers, don't you think? But it is entirely in line with the Hitlerian mindset of the "gay Napoleons," who believe that homosexuality is superior, and that all other `sexual orientations' are perverse and inferior.

Make no mistake about it - homosexuals are not after mere "tolerance." As Oxford University scholar John Gray points out, "When we tolerate a practice, a belief, or a character trait, we let something be that we judge to be undesirable, false, or at least inferior. Our toleration expresses the conviction that, despite its badness, the object of toleration should be left alone."⁸

Toleration is definitely not enough for the promiscuous homosexual lobby - they are after nothing less than full equality, and if people like Michael Swift ever gain control, total and unquestioned superiority.

According to Luke Montgomery, once known as the militant homosexual activist "Luke Sissyfag," "You have to understand that the motivation of the gay community is validation. They want to be approved. They want people to say, "It's okay that you're gay" ... and if you disagree with one tiny, insignificant little point of their wide, broad, sweeping agenda, you're all of a sudden a homophobe and a hatemonger. You're a villain. A bad guy. And this is ludicrous."⁹

Figure 117-2 is a general list of demands released in 1984 by the National Committee for Gay Civil Rights, and entitled "This is Our Creed." Read this list very carefully, and note that every single item is designed to destroy the bond between parents and children, undermine Christian values, and weaken the very fabric of society. Then, after reading the list of demands, try to imagine how loudly the homosexuals and the ACLU would howl if Christians made such demands!

Agenda for the Schools. It is also revealing to read one of the many homosexual policy statements that are issued each year by groups all over the United States.

Very typical of these position statements is the New York State Gay and Lesbian Youth Caucus "Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions," released in 1987. Some of its seventeen resolutions are listed verbatim in Figure 117-3.

Remember that "all schools and universities, public and private," includes the school that your children are attending!

Many school children are already being indoctrinated with "gay" propaganda, designed to inculcate the politically correct view that homosexuals are all helpless and innocent victims. A typical set of teacher directives for use during AIDS classes is shown below. Notice especially the second instruction, which states indirectly that homosexuals are just as blameless as newborn infants.

Manhattan Teacher Training:
Do's and Dont's When Discussing AIDS

• " Homosexuals should not be blamed for the spread of AIDS.
  
• Infants infected with AIDS should not be referred to as "innocent" children, as that implies someone is guilty.
  
• Teachers should not be squeamish about using explicit terms to describe gay sexual behavior.
  
• Stress safe-sex behaviors. Don't make an issue about the number of sex partners.
  
• Teachers should stress to children that they should take a civic stand on issues to protect the civil rights of homosexuals."

Reference: "High School AIDS Education Workshop. Presented by Bruce Schutte and Rebecca Porper, New York City Department of Health.¹⁰

If these directives and demands sound dreamily far-fetched, consider that they are already being enforced by government agencies at many levels. A few examples are shown in Figure 117-4. This two-page spread, which documents just a very few of the outrageous ways in which homosexuals trample the rights of others, can be photocopied as a two-sided flyer for distribution at debates over "gay rights."

By demanding that citizens support their deathstyle in various ways, homosexuals are demanding not only neutrality, but active approval of their perversions. New York City Schools Chancellor Nathan Quinones and New York City Mayor Ed Koch both insisted that their city was not condoning or supporting sexual perversions, although the Harvey Milk School - a school exclusively for homosexual teenagers - was entirely supported with tax dollars (Harvey Milk was an openly homosexual San Francisco City Supervisor).¹¹

New York City gives us another excellent example of the kind of curriculum the homosexuals would like to force on every school district in the country - and what happens to those who do not cooperate.

The entire Queens School District 24 school board was simply dismissed by Chancellor Joseph Fernandez when it would not accept his idea of "multicultural indoctrination" by way of his Children of the Rainbow curriculum. Fernandez demanded that this brainwashing begin in nursery school, where two- and three-year olds would be required to use a "Gay and Lesbian Coloring Book."

More `mature' first graders would be required to discuss three books. The first, Daddy's Roommate, asserts at its opening that "Being gay is just another kind of love." The second, Heather Has Two Mommies, says that "Heather's favorite number is two. She has two arms, two legs, two ears, two hands ... and two mommies: Momma Jane and Momma Kate." The third, Gloria Goes to Gay Pride, features a little girl with two lesbian `parents,' and shows how easily she accepts the PC view as she explains her views on the Gay Pride Parade; "Some women love women, some men love men, and some women and men love each other. That's why we march in the parade - so everyone can have a choice."¹²

It is interesting (and frightening) to note that Daddy's Roommate and Heather Has Two Mommies were published by Alyson Publications of Boston, which also is one of the world's leading publishers and distributors of "kiddie porn" for pedophiles.¹³

Alyson Publisher's books include;

• * Macho Sluts, which includes a short story where a veteran lesbian has sadomasochistic sex with her own 13-year old daughter, whipping her until she bleeds freely;
  
• * The Age Taboo, a series of essays that argue for the abolishment of all age of consent laws;
  
• * Gay Sex: A Manual for Men Who Love Men, which includes seven recommendations by the North American Man-Boy Love Association to help parents  deceive and avoid police and parents of the children they sexually molest; and
  
• * The 1,000+ page Spartacus International Gay Guide, which lists international pedophile support groups and shows exactly where child sexual molesters can find captive boy prostitutes in foreign countries.
  
  This book is so detailed that it even names specific streets and parks where kids can be found.

Under Fernandez' instructions, fourth-graders get detailed instructions on how to use condoms, and sixth-graders get explicit information on how to commit sodomy. By the time they are ten, each child will know this handy tidbit of homosexual advice: "Dental dam - a piece of latex that can be placed over the vulva during oral sex to protect against transmission of viruses that may be present in vaginal fluids, or over the anus during anilingus (oral sex involving the anus)."

For those who missed it, "anilingus" is referred to as "rimming" by homosexuals - where one person sticks his(her) tongue up another person's rear end!

It is interesting to contrast these strange expressions of "neutrality" with the Neoliberal idea that the slightest particle of government aid to religious schools destroys Government neutrality with regards to religion.

Agenda For the Armed Forces

Overview. The primary objective of the "gay rights' movement, as stated above, is not to obtain tolerance for the homosexual lifestyle, because tolerance implies putting up with something that one considers distasteful. Homosexuals want full equality or special privilege, and this, of course, requires the abolition of any standards held by any group that places homosexuals in an inferior position.

The most visible example of such `discrimination' is currently provided by the Armed Forces. Those people who confess to being homosexual are discharged from the service, because the presence of homosexuals in the ranks causes all kinds of predictable problems with unit morale, discipline, and privacy.

The Draft Dodger Steps In. Homosexuals agitated for the elimination of such rules for more than two decades, until Bill Clinton took office in January of 1993. In the first week, this draft dodger attempted to eliminate all barriers to homosexuals in the military. So indebted to the homosexual special interest was Clinton that he ignored the wishes of Congress and all six members of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, who objected strenuously.

Additionally, Gallup polls found that veterans opposed the proposed change 61% to 28% (with 11% undecided), and the general public opposed the change 53% to 35% (with 12% undecided).¹⁴

Moral Officers Are Not Welcome. The agitation for homosexuals in the military became so extreme in early 1993 that General Colin Powell, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told those officers who objected to homosexuals in the military that "If it strikes at the heart of your moral beliefs, then you have to resign."¹⁵

In other words, Powell was saying that moral officers will be forced to resign as immoral homosexuals are welcomed into the military. The homosexuals will cheer this development, because, in their warped worldview, anyone who has any morals by definition is `judgmental,' and they should be punished by any means possible.

Powell and other high-ranking officers also stated that "indoctrination training" would be instituted for all normal soldiers should homosexuals be accepted into the military.

Notice that it is always the "straights" who must be indoctrinated [brainwashed], as if it were only normal people who are capable of discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation. Naturally, anyone who suggests that homosexuals undergo such "sensitivity training" to lower their degree of anti-"straight" bigotry will be met with Neoliberal gasps of disbelief and indignant accusations of "homophobia."

The reason that nobody has suggested indoctrinating homosexuals is that they consider themselves to be the new standard of humanity, and therefore do not need to be instructed in any way, shape or form.

Obituary for the Marine Corps. The United States Marine Corps (USMC) has always justly prided itself on its professionalism and "can-do" attitude, and recruits heavily by relying on its `macho' image, e.g., "A Few Good Men."

The addition of homosexuals, with all of their accompanying perversions and effeminacy, would obviously be extremely damaging to the Corps.

When it appeared as if the Corps would be forced to admit sexual perverts to its ranks, Major Arthur J. Corbett wrote a poignant `obituary' in the January 1993 issue of Marine Corps Quarterly that;

"Marines are an incredulous lot by nature, and brutally honest in their observations and decisions. The young officers who attempt to explain how homosexuality is an `alternate' instead of a deviate lifestyle, will quickly lose the respect of their Marines and a bit of their own honor in the process.

"Sanitized terms like `sexual orientation' may serve to obfuscate the gross realities of a perverse lifestyle to a jaded public, but Marines living in a barracks will rightfully question leadership that discredits by association the sacrifices they are willing to make. The party line will be that homosexuals are Marines, just like you. The cognitive dissonance that this simple, yet official, lie must engender will tug at the credibility and ultimately rend the integrity of our Corps.

"Critics claim that homosexuals already lurk in our ranks. The salient difference between the current reality and the proposed policy is that now homosexuals lie to the Marine Corps. Soon we will find that to accommodate homosexuals, the Marine Corps must lie to Marines, and they in turn to one another. Institutions like the Marine Corps are not built upon deceit ...

"It is time to ask Congress to disband our Marine Corps ... We should transfer our personnel to another service and don their uniform. It is better to wear proudly the uniform of another service than to see the Globe and Anchor progressively defamed."¹⁶

References: Homosexual Objectives

[1] As described by David Horowitz. "The Queer Fellows." The American Spectator, January 1993, pages 42 to 48.

[2] Human Rights Campaign Fund, Just Out Magazine, March 1989.

[3] Homosexual activist Frank Brown, quoted in Dirk Johnson, New York Times News Service. "Stunned Colorado Gays Ponder Election." The Oregonian, November 8, 1992, page A22.

[4] Editorial in Guide Magazine, May 1991, page 6.

[5] Lesbian Florence King, quoted in Insight on the News, September 17, 1990, page 16.

[6] Homosexual activist Robert Schwab, quoted in Kirk Kidwell. "Homosexuals Flex Muscle in Washington." American Family Association Journal, January 1988, pages 6 to 8.

[7] As described in "The Week." National Review, April 11, 1986, page 16.

[8] John Gray, Oxford University scholar, quoted in David Reinhard. "The Nine Lives of Ballot Measure 9." The Oregonian, November 12, 1992, page C12.

[9] Luke Montgomery, once known as "Luke Sissyfag," quoted in Mark Olsen's book Refuge and in "On Record." American Family Association Journal, March 1997, page 11.

[10] "The New School Tie." National Review, July 12, 1985, pages 20 and 21.

[11] Judith A. Reisman and Edward W. Eichel. Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People. Lafayette, Louisiana: Huntington House Publishers, 1990. 237 pages.

[12] George F. Will. "New York City Takes Sex Education Too Far." The Oregonian, December 6, 1992, page E4.

[13] Greg Mueller and Tom Kilgannon. "Publisher of Daddy's Roommate and Pro-Gay Kid's Books Also Caters to Child Molesters." Lambda Report, March 24, 1993, page 1.

[14] Gallup Poll of January 21-22, 1993, for Newsweek Magazine. Eric Schmitt, New York Times News Service. "Military Objections Widespread." The Oregonian, January 27, 1993, pages A1 and A8.

[15] "General Powell Tells Midshipmen Resignation Might Be Obligatory." The Wanderer, January 21, 1993, pages 1 and 10.

[16] "USMC Officer to Congress: Abolish the Corps Rather Than Admit Homosexuals." The Wanderer, January 28, 1993, pages 1 and 7.

Further Reading: Homosexual Objectives

American Civil Liberties Union. The Rights of Gay People. Avon Books Mail Order Department, 250 West 55th Street, New York, New York 10019. 1975, 263 pages. The rights of homosexuals, including the rights to speak and organize; the rights to have occupational licenses; immigration and naturalization; security clearances, the family, housing and accommodations, and the armed services. Includes a bibliography and list of homosexual organizations.

Congressman William Dannemeyer. Shadow in the Land. Order from Ignatius Press, 15 Oakland Avenue, Harrison, New York 10528. 1989, $9.95. A comprehensive overview of the homosexual movement - its origins, evolution, and social and political objectives.

Lambda Report. Published by the Citizen's Rights Foundation, Post Office Box 45252, Washington, DC 20026-5252. Telephone: (703) 497-2702. This monthly periodical monitors the homosexual agenda in this culture and exposes its goals and tactics.

Roger J. Magnuson. Are Gay Rights Right? Straitgate Press, 2200 West 66th Street, Suite 190, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423. 1986; $7.00. Reviewed by Chilton Williamson, Jr. on page 58 of the July 18, 1986 issue of National Review. The author examines the strategies and tactics used by the homosexual movement and carefully looks at the root of the problem to arrive at the conclusion that `gay rights' are not a viable subject for legislation. He also takes a close look at the stated objectives of the `gay rights' movement, i.e., a superior position in society.

Judith A. Reisman and Edward W. Eichel. Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People. Lafayette, Louisiana: Huntington House Publishers, 1990. 237 pages. An excellent and detailed examination of the background of the Alfred Kinsey sexual studies that "showed" that children are sexual from birth and that ten percent of the population is exclusively homosexual. This book examines in detail the flaws in Kinsey's studies, and looks at the machinations of modern-day `sexologists' who build their work on his studies. Reisman also details the baleful impacts that Kinsey-style sex education has had on our country.

Father Enrique T. Rueda. The Homosexual Network. $29.95, 1986, 700 pages. Order from the Devin Adair Company, 143 Sound Beach Avenue, Post Office Box A, Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870. The author covers every aspect of the homosexual network; its acceptability, tactics, subculture, ideology, goals, everything; this is the most complete book on the subject ever written. The book addresses in detail the homosexual ideology, subcultures, religion, goals, funding, and intimate connections with Neoliberalism. It includes a 72-page section on the influence and role of homosexuality in the Catholic Church. Also covered are the "Gayellow Pages," ties between the movement and the Neoliberals and Neofeminists. The book also deals with the connections between homosexuality and organized pedophile groups.

Essay on the Homosexual Revolution by Michael Swift

THIS ESSAY is outre, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of you shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all-male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.

Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too and only man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand with depth and feeling the mind and body of another man.

All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men.

All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically, and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.

If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies.

We shall write poems of the love between men; we shall stage plays in which man openly caresses man; we shall make films about the love between heroic men which will replace the cheap, superficial, sentimental, insipid, juvenile, heterosexual infatuations presently dominating your cinema screens. We shall sculpt statues of beautiful young men, of bold athletes which will be placed in your parks, your squares, your plazas. The museums of the world will be filled only with paintings of graceful, naked lads.

Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles. We will eliminate heterosexual liaisons through the devices of wit and ridicule, devices which we are skilled in employing.

We will unmask the powerful homosexuals who masquerade as heterosexuals. You will be shocked and frightened when you find that your presidents and their sons, your industrialists, your senators, your mayors, your generals, your athletes, your film stars, your television personalities, your civic leaders, your priests are not the safe, familiar, bourgeois, heterosexual figures you assumed them to be. We are everywhere; we have infiltrated your ranks. Be careful when you speak of homosexuals because we are always among you; we may be sleeping in the same bed with you.

There will be no compromises. We are not middle-class weaklings. Highly intelligent, we are the natural aristocrats of the human race, and steely-minded aristocrats never settle for less. Those who oppose us will be exiled.

We shall raise vast, private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are as invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers. The family unit - spawning ground of lies, betrayals, mediocrity, hypocrisy, and violence - will be abolished. The family unit, which only dampens imagination and curbs free will, must be eliminated. Perfect boys will be conceived and grown in the genetic laboratory. They will be bonded together in a communal setting, under the control and instruction of homosexual savants.

All churches who condemn us will be closed. Our only gods are handsome young men. We adhere to a cult of beauty, moral and aesthetic. All that is ugly and vulgar and banal will be annihilated. Since we are alienated from middle-class heterosexual conventions, we are free to live our lives according to the dictates of the pure imagination. For us too much is not enough.

The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men.

We shall rewrite history, history filled and debased with your heterosexual lies and distortions. We shall portray the homosexuality of the great leaders and thinkers who have shaped the world. We will demonstrate that homosexuality and intelligence and imagination are inextricably linked, and that homosexuality is a requirement for true nobility, true beauty in a man.

We shall be victorious because we are fueled with the ferocious bitterness of the oppressed who have been forced to play seemingly bit parts in your dumb, heterosexual shows throughout the ages. We too are capable of firing guns and manning the barricades of the ultimate revolution.

Tremble, hetero swine, when we appear before you without our masks!

Reference. This essay was printed in the February 15, 1987 issue of the homosexual newspaper Gay Community News by Michael Swift, and was reprinted in the February 15-21 1987 Congressional Record.

Demands of the National Committee for Gay Civil Rights

"This Is Our Creed"

(1) "We believe every adult and child has the right to decide for themselves their own sexual orientation.

(2) We believe every individual or group which condemns homosexuality as wrong or sinful is guilty of bigotry.

(3) We believe every child is entitled to non-discriminatory sex educational courses without parental interference ... and to fulfill their destinies according to their sexual orientations.

(4) We define sexual orientation as any and every inclination or impulse which nature bestows upon a person.

(5) We reject the notion that any private act or behavior between consenting adults or children is unnatural or disordered.

(6) We demand the recognition of homosexuality as a legitimate alternative lifestyle equal in all respects to traditional lifestyles.

(7) We demand judicial, legislative, and executive action to protect our sexual orientations and preferences.

(8) We condemn all groups -- religious or otherwise -- who preach sexual bigotry and discrimination.

(9) We condemn those misguided parents who impose their homophobic prejudices upon their children.

(10) We assert there is nothing higher than man himself to decide moral and ethical values and that god made man supreme.

(11) We defend the rights of atheists, anarchists, and agnostics to live by their values and beliefs according to their consciences. In this we are united.

(12) We condemn all those who presume to pass judgement on others.

(13) We believe in equal rights for all and equal pay for equal work and assert that no corporation, government agency, or religious or educational group has the right to restrict or discourage private homosexual activity.

(14) We believe our human rights will be realized in a social and political order where truth and justice prevail.

(15) This we believe. This is our creed."

Notes. Homosexual strategists have correctly recognized that the family is the greatest obstacle to achievement of all of their goals. This is demonstrated in Michael Swift's essay, shown earlier in this chapter. Therefore, this list of demands heavily emphasizes actions that would undermine the family and put obstacles between parents and their children. See particularly items 1, 3, and 9.

Item 4 obviously represents a demand for 'straight' recognition of bestiality, among other things.

Item 5 is an obvious demand for legalized child sexual abuse, or, as homosexual activists call it, "intergenerational love."

Notice that most of these items begin with the words "We condemn" or "We demand." This is typical of the homosexual mentality; there is no compromise, just a selfish expectation that everyone must yield completely to them. Note that items 2, 8, and 9 specifically condemn all those groups and people who may believe differently from homosexual activists, who demand that their beliefs be acknowledged. This hypocritical double standard is also typical of the homosexual mindset.

In their mad and almost illiterate rush to draw up their list of demands, this homosexual group has made numerous logical mistakes in their "creed." For instance, note that item 10 acknowledges the existence of a god, but that man instead is supreme. Also note that item 12 is comically self-contradictory.

Reference. 1984 Draft III internal review copy entitled "This is Our Creed," by the National Committee for Gay Civil Rights, Church Annex Building, Washington, D.C.

Typical Demands of Homosexuals
Regarding School Indoctrination Programs

The 1987 New York State Gay and Leasbian Youth Caucus
"Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions"

RESOLVED, that all legislation restricting access to and availability of family planning, birth control, reproductive health information, services andtreatment be repealed [note the close ties between the homosexuals and the pro-abortion movement].

RESOLVED, that all federal, state, and local funding for public and private schools and universities be cut off until all discrimination on the basisof sexual orientation be eradicated [note the willingness to force their beliefs down everyone else's throats].

RESOLVED, that all schools and universities, public and private, cover all sexualities in the curricula [this is Newspeak for enforced and mandatory`sensitivity classes,' whose purpose is to propagandize and force students into accepting that sodomy is `just another lifestyle].

RESOLVED, that all schools and universities, public and private, discuss the accomplishments of gays, lesbians, and bisexuals in literature,history/herstory, mathematics, science, art, music and other courses.

RESOLVED, that all schools and universities, public and private, develop a gay and lesbian studies program.

RESOLVED, that all schools and universities, public and private, mandate sensitization workshops on gay and lesbian issues, beginning at theelementary level [this objective has already been largely met in our public school system].

RESOLVED, that all schools and universities, public and private, punish those members who harass gays, lesbians, and bisexuals [remember thatthe homosexual and liberal definition of "harassment" is infinitely expandable, including debating them in a public forum, writing any material that they do not approve of, refusing to meet any of their demands, and opposing them in any way whatever].

RESOLVED, that all schools and universities, public and private, immediately recognize and found student organizations for gays, lesbians, andbisexuals [the homosexuals do not even want to be bothered to do the work themselves. They demand that the school do all the research and organizing, while they lay back and enjoy the result].

RESOLVED, that all youth groups and student organizations admit gays, lesbians, and bisexuals [even if they are forced upon groups that view their lifestyles as abhorrent].

National Organization for Women:
"Lesbians in the Schools."

"School counselors should be required to take courses in human sexuality in which a comprehensive and positive view of lesbianism is presented. Lesbians as well as heterosexual counselors should be represented on the guidance staff. The names and phone numbers of gay counseling services should be made available to all students and school psychologists.

Courses in sex education should be taught by persons who have taken the [pro-homosexual] human sexuality courses already mentioned. Students will thus be encouraged to explore alternate life styles, including lesbianism. Textbooks which do not mention lesbianism or which refer to it as a mental disorder should not be used in sex education courses.

Lesbian Studies: Schools should set up lesbian studies programs in connection with women's studies programs to foster pride in the adolescent lesbian and to show heterosexual students that lesbians have made significant contributions to society. Learning about these contributions would foster positive feelings on the part of all students.

Libraries: School libraries should be supplied with bibliographies of lesbian literature and urged to purchase novels, stories, poetry, and nonfiction books that portray the joy of women loving women. The use of these books should be encouraged in literature and history classes.

Lesbian Clubs: Lesbian clubs should be established in the schools. Such organizations would help lesbians to develop pride in their life styles, and to help overcome the prejudice of heterosexual students and faculty."

Reference for NOW Program. Jean O'Leary and Ginny Vida. "Lesbians and the Schools." This article appeared in the New York National Organization for Women (NOW) Newsletter under the title "Struggle to End Sex Bias -- Report on Sex Bias in the Public Schools."

Examples of the Malevolent Effects of "Gay Rights" Laws:
What Happens When the Homosexuals Get Their Way

* "Gay rights" laws have condemned thousands of innocent women to death. In most states, a physician faces a lawsuit and/or criminal prosecution if he notifies the wife of an HIV-positive man that he has the disease. And most states cannot compel the HIV testing of rapists. This means that rape victims are prohibited from knowing their rapist's HIV status -- unless the rapist agrees to testing, a rare event indeed.^A

* "Gay rights" laws endanger the lives of health professionals and their patients. The United States Department of Health and Human Services ordered a Valhalla, New York hospital to hire an AIDS-infected worker, without placing any restrictions on his duties, or lose millions in Federal financing.^B

Dr. Lorraine Day, chief of orthopedic surgery at the San Francisco General Hospital, said that "[Doctors] don't have the right to automatically test for AIDS, even though we have the right to test every patient for any other disease known to man, without a special consent. Why do I have to take care of a patient with a concealed weapon -- AIDS -- and not be allowed to know that the patient has a disease that can kill me, my nurses, and my staff?" Although it has been documented that blood staining occurs in at least half of all major operations, physicians are prohibited from testing the HIV status of their patients.^A

* "Gay rights" laws encourage the spread of AIDS. Even though AIDS is obviously a sexually-transmitted disease (STD), efforts to classify HIV infection as an STD have been defeated all over the country by homosexuals on the grounds that this would require the notification of sexual partners. Once again, the homosexual's privacy right is supreme over the lives of others.

* "Gay rights" laws are blatant attempts to force homosexual immorality down the throats of the public. One glaring example was provided by New Jersey Governor James Florio, who signed a homosexual rights law on January 19, 1992. This law forced all churches to admit homosexuals to all of the sacraments (including the priesthood), and compelled them to perform homosexual marriages. The New Jersey ordinance even prohibited pastors from preaching against homosexuality and prohibited any citizens from participating in any kind of boycott against a business that supported homosexuality! Florio refused to allow any church exemptions for any part of the law whatever, saying that "Private entities should not be allowed to discriminate on the basis of affectional or sexual orientation." Homosexual organizations betrayed their utter contempt for the beliefs of others by fanatically opposing attempts to gain church exemptions to the law. Eventually, after spending tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, courts agreed that churches only would be exempt from this type of foolishness -- for now. But how long will it be before the courts uphold such coercive laws? Keep in mind that non-churchgoing citizens are still subject to the above strictures.^C

The Minneapolis Civil Rights Commission fined the Catholic Archdiocese of Minneapolis-St. Paul $35,000 for violating a municipal "gay rights" ordinance when it expelled the dissident pro-sodomy allegedly "Catholic" group Dignity from its Campus Ministry Newman Center. $20,000 of this would go directly to Dignity and $15,000 to the city, a tidy little arrangement with not a little conflict of interest.^D

* "Gay rights" laws are one-way only, and this leads to bizarre results where homosexuals may freely discriminate against normal people and be protected under the law. For example, Local 706, the Hair and Stylist Union of North Hollywood, California has a confirmed official policy of not admitting anyone to the union unless they are practicing homosexuals.^D

Another example of the one-way nature of "gay rights" laws involves indoctrination programs. In all cases, it is invariably "straight" people who must be indoctrinated in how to be more "accepting" and "tolerant" -- never homosexuals, because it is the homosexuals who write the programs and the homosexuals who arrogantly believe that they are flawless in this regard.

* "Gay rights" laws deliberately suppress and punish speech that homosexuals do not agree with. On March 21, 1991, Hawaii Governor John Waihee signed a statewide anti-discrimination law that homosexuals had strongly fought for. Under this law, no employer may print anything that any homosexual may find to be "discriminatory." Additionally, churches are not allowed ask about a prospective employee's sexual orientation, and once a homosexual is hired, the churches could not fire him, even if he was predatory. Despite these strictures, the church would be the defendant in any litigation brought by parties whose children had been molested by homosexuals that the church had been compelled to hire or retain.^E

David Hardesty, chaplain of Portland, Oregon's Eastmoreland Hospital, was fired from his job for contributing $100 to an anti-gay rights ballot measure fund and for stating in public that homosexuality is unbiblical. He was presented with a "forced resignation" the day after making his statements.^F Local homosexual newspapers and magazines were filled with letters supporting Hardesty's firing and demanding the firing of all people who opposed homosexuality in any way.

The Canadian Radiotelevision and Telecommunications Commission has the power to fine any station a quarter of a million dollars and individuals $20,000 if they utter any statement that is deemed to be "anti-gay." There is no appeal of this fine, and the definition of what is "anti-gay" is left to the homosexuals themselves! Naturally, there is no sanction whatever for a homosexual who rails against heterosexuals.^G

And in Sweden, a pastor who preached a sermon on Sodom and Gomorrah was sentenced to a month in prison because he allegedly committed "verbal violence" against homosexuals.^H

* "Gay rights" laws ruthlessly and indiscriminately punish even bystanders who are not involved in the battle over homosexual rights. A 100-year old private dental clinic for the poor in New York City had to finally close its doors after being forced to pay a $50,000 fine by the City's Human Rights Commission, for the 'crime' of simply referring two AIDS carriers with bleeding oral lesions elsewhere. The clinic personnel simply did not believe they had the equipment or the expertise to help them. Now, the thousands of poor that the clinic sees on a regular basis have to pay for their care or go without.^I

* "Gay rights" laws place helpless children at the mercy of homosexual pedophiles. In New London, Wisconsin, a private religious center for troubled boys (which takes not a dime of government assistance) was forced by the State to sign a binding pledge to hire avowed, practicing homosexuals or have the boys forcibly removed from the center within 48 hours, have the center closed down, and face multi-thousand dollar fines. A Roman Catholic priest in St. Paul, Minnesota was threatened by a judge with up to a year in jail for the 'crime' of refusing to hire as a teacher for young boys a homosexual with a long criminal record of child molestation. And Anglican Bishop Alexander Muge was barred from preaching in a church in his own denomination in Walnut Creek, California, because he preached against sodomy.^D

* "Gay rights" laws encourage homosexual thuggery. An Oregon pharmacist was harassed and picketed by gangs of homosexuals after he announced that he would no longer sell condoms in his pharmacy because they conflicted with his Catholic beliefs. The homosexuals condemned him for not slavishly and mindlessly endorsing their version of "safe sex."^I This is only one example of the coercion favored by homosexuals when the law is on their side.

[A] Judith A. Reisman and Edward W. Eichel. Kinsey, Sex and Fraud: The Indoctrination of a People. Lafayette, Louisiana: Huntington House Publishers, 1990. 237 pages. Pages 109 and 110.

[B] The New York Times, April 23, 1992. Also described in "Hospital Ordered to Hire HIV Worker; New Precedent Set." Intercessors for America Newsletter, June 1992, page 8.

[C] "Church Sues Over Homosexual Rights Law." Rutherford [Rutherford Institute], July 1992, page 4. Also see the June 22, 1992 News Release from The Rutherford Institute entitled "Church Succeeds in Homosexual Rights Suit."

[D] "Faith and Homosexuality" and "Discriminate Against Homosexuals?" Family Research Newsletter, January-March 1991, pages 6 and 7.

[E] Sally Page Browning. "What Next?" The Rutherford Institute Journal, February 1992, page 7.

[F] Bill MacKenzie. "Chaplain Out After Measure 9 Remarks." The Oregonian, September 10, 1992.

[G] World Briefs. "Canada." Just Out, February 1992, page 5.

[H] "Hate Literature Laws Sweep the U.S. and Other Western Democracies." Christian World Report, April 1989, page 1.

[I] As described in "The New School Tie." National Review, July 12, 1985, pages 20 and 21.

Addendum

First, a letter from Jay Crosby:

While we're at it (and forgive, please, that I can't give a specific page number), legendary historians Will and Ariel Durant noted some 30 years ago that the LAST revolution in any society before that society falls is a HOMOSEXUAL revolution. It should be of great concern that, on the basis of their lifetime of studies, two of our most eminent historians--historians with (as far as I am aware) no axe to grind, no particular religious trip to push--observed that every great society came down with a homosexual revolution. These American "zionists" like Falwell and Robertson are just so sure that the USA is on God's side, and that it will never crash and burn. If there's any other lesson we can learn from history it is that Islam could WIN. It would hardly be the first time Mohammed's disciples ruled the world.

To which I answered:

And, if you were not aware, sodomy is very rampant in Islam, especially with the Mullahs. I have a good number of Muslim men-turned-Christian who report that sodomy is very common in every Islamic nation, especially at the mosque. A fellow from Azerbaijan, who is now saved, said his Dad, a devout Muslim, would never let him near a mosque. They had prayers at home and never went for Friday prayer. Sort of a "house mosque" like a house church??? What a riot. He said he never walked the street alone-- always with three other boys so they could fight off the Mullahs. Now, what you wrote is terrifying. What if all the sodomites in the USA became Muslims?

John Gunther, in his work Inside Africa, reported that almost all Western men who become Muslims are homosexuals. Islam seems to attract sodomites. There will come a day, mark it down, when sodomites in the USA and Europe will see Islam as the vehicle they can use to dominate the world. And, with their historic tolerance of sodomy, as with the Dervishes, Islam will welcome these sodomites as the vehicle they can also use to dominate the world. The Roman army, at the end of the Roman Empire era, had so much problem with desertion to the sodomite enemy, by Roman soldiers, that they allowed Roman soldiers to bring their sodomite lover with when they enlisted, so that they would stay loyal.

True Bible believers will soon need to set in place quiet plans for survival of their families and the defense of their sons and daughters. Nothing less than revolution will satisfy the flaming lust of sodomites. Some will be restrained, but when the flood gates open, the white hot lust of Sodom, as in Genesis 19, will hit the streets and be banging on your door. The idiot politicians will make the laws to carry along the "rights" issues, for the politicians of the Western world today are of the most weak and beggarly sort of people. Many of them are bisexual as well. If not, they would resist sodomy. The Antichrist himself is said, in Daniel:

Daniel 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.

Revolution is resisted by force alone, AND avoidance. If you can avoid the confrontation, do so. Move to another state or nation as need be. There will be men who will defend their families, and, in the process, will end up in prison. How much more useful a Dad is if he is alive and there when he is needed. So, there is no shame in quietly slipping on by the attack.

If avoidance fails, arm your sons and daughters, and teach them deadly force-- NOT Oriental Martial Arts please. Hand to hand is suicide. When the law of Caesar works to destroy that which is precious to Jesus Christ, such as believers, local churches, and our families, then Caesar must, in those areas of offense only, be disobeyed. Work it out as the Lord Jesus and the Word of God move you. Let not your right hand know what your left hand is doing.

We cannot assume that AIDS will remove the problem. The gay rights legislation is coming on too strong and rapidly for us to procrastinate.

LINKS:

HOMOSEXUAL TACTICS

POPULATION EDUCATION-- UN VERSION

 

BACK TO SODOMY MENU PAGE

BACK TO WAR ROOM-- GENERAL WICKEDNESS

RETURN TO ENTRY PAGE OF JOURNAL

ge